|
|
|
|
H1N1 Consulting
Paradigm
Shift
Viral
Evolution
Intervention
Monitoring
Vaccine
Screening
Vaccine
Development
Expression
Profiling
Drug
Discovery
Custom
Therapies
Patents
|
|
|
Audio:Apr29
May2
May16
MAP
twitter
Commentary
MERS
SARS-CoV-like Outbreaks In Al Hasa Hospitals
Recombinomics
Commentary 04:15
June 20, 2013
The above transmission map is Figure 2
from the New England Journal of Medicine paper
“Hospital Outbreak of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus”
which details the MERS-CoV spread in Al Hasa (see map)
in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). This large outbreak has
striking similarities with SARS-CoV nosocomial outbreaks in 2003 which
involve super spreaders and multiple transmission chains, which are
readily seen in the above figure. Dispalyed are 23 confirmed
cases, as well as two probable cases (the index case represented by
dotted circle A and the super spreader represented by dotted circle
C). The index case infected one of his sons (box O) and was the
likely source for a health care worker (hexagon R) and the super
spreader.
The super spreader infected 6 patients (circles D-I) in the dialysis
unit, as well as one (J) in the ICU. Three of those infected by
the super spreader were the source for two more rounds of
transmission. Thus, there were three sets of H2H2H2H2H
transmission chains and sequences were published from isolates from
four members of these chains (patient K, A/Al Hasa 4/2013,
infected doctor V, A/Al Hasa 1/2013
and both sequences were identical, while sequences from patient J, A/Al Hasa 2/2013,
and patient I, A/Al
Hasa 3/2013 were virtually
identical).
The paper clear demonstrates multiple transmission rounds, but only
describes a subset of the cases. There were 11 probable cases
which were not detailed (other than the index case and super spreader)
and are not included in the KSA MoH or WHO tallies. The index
case was part of a 4 member family cluster, as described in multiple media
reports and videos, as well as a detailed English language report,
which was also carried on ProMED.
The index case (56M, Mohammed al-Sheikh) was not tested, but his older
son (33M) was confirmed. Another son (26M) was hospitalized
and both brothers
were pictured
in media and video reports, including stories and videos on their
discharges. A younger sister was symptomatic but tested negative
and was not hospitalized. Thus, out of the four likely cases,
only one was confirmed and listed in the KSA / WHO total.
The confirmed case is one of the seven discharged MERS-CoV cases in
KSA, although two other family members were almost certainly infected
and had mild cases. Thus, even though these were family members
of the index case for this large nosocomial outbreak which was written
up in NEJM spawning multiple media reports, which clearly placed
MERS-CoV in the SARS-CoV threat level, only one case in the familial
cluster has been confirmed.
Although
the index case is listed as
having acquired MERS-CoV in the community, family members cite the
hospital as the origin. The levels of MERS-CoV circulating in
humans
is orders of magnitude higher than the confirmed cases, which is also
supported by the export of cases from the Middle East to England,
France, Tunisia, and Italy.
Thus, this cluster helps explain why the case fatality rate is 82% in
KSA. The biased testing of hospital cases and limited detection
of milder cases has produced a CFR that is markedly higher than the Jordan
ICU outbreak or the onward
transmission cases in England, France, Tunisia, and Italy.
Similarly, the multiple transmission chains support sustained
transmission, which WHO describes as "seemingly
sporadic".
Media
Link
Recombinomics
Presentations
Recombinomics
Publications
Recombinomics
Paper
at Nature Precedings
|