![]() |
|||||||||||
Home | Founder | What's New | In The News | Consulting | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||
H1N1 Consulting Paradigm Shift Intervention Monitoring |
Audio:Jun17
Jul15
Aug19
Sep16
![]() ![]() Live feed of underlying pandemic map data here Commentary
Both of these fatal infections developed in late 2009. A search of NA sequences at GISAID identified two additional sequences from patients in Japan (A/HIROSHIMA/490/2009) and Canada (A/Ontario/313762/2009). These samples were also collected in late 2009 and the NA is likely to be Relenza resistant. In addition, NA sequences from Chile (A/Santiago/21579/2009 and A/Chile/1579/2009) and Italy (A/Italy/181/2009) had I222K which are also likely to be Relenza resistant since the isoleucine at position 222 was replaced with another basic amino acid (lysine instead or arginine). The two sequence from Chile were from a patient (44F) who was also treated with Tamiflu, but died three days after admission. She was obese and had diabetes, but the characterization sheet associated with the sequence did not indicate that she was immunosupressed or treated with Relenza. The sudden appearance of I222R and associated resistance to Relenza are causes for concern. Relenza use increased in late 2009 because of the explosion of H1N1 cases in the northern hemisphere. Reports of H274Y and associated resistance to Tamiflu and Peramivir and reports of I222R in four patients (and death in at least two) along with I222K in two additional patients and death in at least one, raise concerns that emerging pandemic H1N1 strains will be resistant to the three most widely used neuraminidase inhibitors. Media Links Recombinomics
Presentations |
||||||||||
|
Webmaster:
webmaster@recombinomics.com
© 2010
Recombinomics. All
rights
reserved.